Mechanically, this answer is simply wrong; the game feature itself says "If the creature [averts its eyes], it can't see the medusa until the start of its next turn" - and the rules on unseen attackers and targets are cited in the other answers. Petrifying Gaze: When a creature that can see the medusa's eyes starts its turn within 30 ft. of the medusa, the medusa can force it to make a DC 14 Constitution saving throw if the medusa isn't Incapacitated and can see the creature. Is there a way to save a X = 0 Stonecoil Serpent? If the creature looks at the medusa in the meantime, it must immediately make the save. In 19th century France, were police able to send people to jail without a trial, as presented in "Les Misérables"? Processor and operating systems for automatic lifts/elevators. Display the exponent from a binary floating point number as a decimal value. But you can also take this mechanic and open it up to a different playstyle: For extra flavour; in the Medusa's example: if all players avert their eyes, You could just take the Medusa off the board and keep a personal map on where she is. Can the target of Wrathful Smite close their eyes/find cover and make their WIS check without disadvantage? Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange! How to remove unique strings from a textfile? Why would a compass not work in my world? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Please check that I haven't changed your meaning. With monsters like the medusa or basilisk it states that you can avert your eyes to avoid the petrifying gaze. I'm assuming it's related to partial blindness or concealment but I'm not sure. My question is: Does every PC know about the pretrifying gaze of these creatures? site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa.
It's worth noting that averting one's eyes is not a common interaction in the game. using perception (hearing) on where the Medusa might be. Creative ways to resolve Robe of Eyes and a Basilisk's Petrifying Gaze. Can someone explain the use and meaning of the phrase "leider geil"? Is a creature that sees a Medusa's eyes automatically subjected to a saving throw? Does the purported proof of Rota's conjecture provide an algorithm for calculating the forbidden minors of matroids over arbitrary finite fields? I made an edit to clean up your answer a little. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Whether you think that makes sense or not, it's exactly how the interaction is actually simulated mechanically. Vampires will turn you into one of them. No, you cannot look at the floor and retain vision of her. Creating new Help Center documents for Review queues: Project overview. Press J to jump to the feed. Running into "extremely life like" statues along the way will really tip them off that this is a medusa lair.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. And don't be afraid to make encounters brutally difficult, because that's where the adventure really shines. You can still see her, but you cant see her clearly, a mechanic I could apply to attacking a medusa by its shadow, its reflection, or what you can technically sort of see as you stare at its bellybutton to evade its gaze. (Special case: Lock-in amplification). While an interesting angle, I think perhaps you should connect this better to the actual rules of the game, but that might just be my preference. If the creature looks at the medusa in the meantime, it must immediately make the save. All the creature’s allies are considered to be averting their eyes from the creature with the gaze attack, and have a 50% chance to not need to make a saving throw against the gaze attack each round. Can I include my published short story as a chapter to my new book? But assuming the adventurer knows a medusa, basilisk or some other petrifying creature is in the area, it's reasonable to think they'd be on their guard. The medusa has the Petrifying Gaze trait: When a creature that can see the medusa's eyes starts its turn within 30 feet of the medusa, the medusa can force it to make a DC 14 Constitution saving throw if the medusa isn't incapacitated and can see the creature. But how would he look at the spot, whilst avoiding the Gaze? Role-playing Games Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for gamemasters and players of tabletop, paper-and-pencil role-playing games. Are there proposals for preserving ballot secrecy when a candidate scores 100% in a very small polling station? So what are all the things that happen when your eyes are averted?
Can an illusion block a monster's harmful gaze? To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.
Creative ways to resolve Robe of Eyes and a Basilisk's Petrifying Gaze. [...] Unless surprised, a creature can avert its eyes to avoid the saving throw at the start of its turn. Yeah I thought so. Stick with the rules as much as you can. Have you run it this way or seen it run? Why do SSL certificates have country codes (or other metadata)? I was also thinking about a homebrewed creature with that feature (some sort of failed experiment of a wizard, that also turned himself to stone). Because how would you know that you should avert your eyes if you've never heard of / encountered such a creature? Then make the players "guess" where she is, e.g. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. What happens if you start outside of the range of the Medusa's gaze but then move closer? I must have missed it. I too would recommend Bromanov's approach. Spell targeting in general only requires, Welcome to RPG.SE! The "that you can see" clause in Magic Missile is redundant, no spell can target a creature or point you can't see as per the basic spellcasting rules. I'm gonna chime in on this one because as someone who does MAA and played football you don't need to look your opponent in the eyes to land a good hit on them. When my players decide to avert their eyes, I treat it as: "I am looking by, but not directly at, the medusa, therefore she can't petrify me, but by that same token, I can't see her so well as to be able to deal a critical.". Does "a signal is buried in noise" mean that the noise amplitude is still smaller than the signal amplitude?